Superpower Review: I Tested the 100+ Biomarker Panel — Here’s What $349 Actually Gets You

I lift four days a week, track my macros, guard my sleep like it’s a family heirloom, and eat more fiber than my digestive system strictly asked for. And every afternoon around 2:30, I hit a wall. Not a “maybe I need a coffee” wall. A “why is my body doing this” wall.

When your basics are covered and you’re still crashing, the next question isn’t another optimization tip. It’s whether something biological is going on, and whether you can actually find out without a six-month wait and a fight with your insurance.

So I tried Superpower, the at-home biomarker testing membership that advertises 100+ lab markers, an AI chat, and a personalized Action Plan for an annual fee. Here’s the short version before you get attached: I think it’s worth it for the depth of data, especially if you’ve never had broad bloodwork done or you can’t easily get an appointment with a doctor. The membership runs $349 a year ($299 with the “wellness daddy” code, $399 in New York and New Jersey because of state lab regulations), it’s HSA/FSA eligible, and the draw itself is quick. The trade-offs are real, though: the AI advice can be simplistic, the Action Plan told a wellness-experienced reviewer things she already did, and the customer service complaints on Trustpilot are the kind you should read before you enter a credit card number, not after.

I went into this asking what a 100+ biomarker panel actually adds when your annual physical already covers the standard stuff. That question shaped everything below, including a section where the honest answer is “it depends on how you count.”

What Superpower is and what it actually costs

Superpower is an annual membership that covers an initial 100+ biomarker panel, a “Digital Twin” results dashboard, AI chat, and a personalized Action Plan. What you’ll actually be charged today is $349 a year, or $299 with the “wellness daddy” discount code, and $399 if you’re in New York or New Jersey because of state lab regulations. It launched at $199, so if you’ve read an older review quoting that number, it’s stale. One reviewer’s plan ran $299/year for 187 biomarkers across two tests, which gives you a sense of what a real invoice looked like for a heavier user.

Two extra costs to expect. The at-home blood draw, where someone comes to you instead of you going to Quest, runs roughly $115, and it’s optional. And during signup you’ll hit upsell screens offering panel upgrades, so budget for willpower. On the plus side, HSA/FSA funds work, which softens the sticker price if you have a flexible spending account sitting there anyway. (How much does Superpower actually cost breaks down the add-ons further.)

Does Superpower really test 100+ biomarkers?

Depends, and the deciding factor is how you count. Four numbers sit side by side here. The marketing says 100+ biomarkers, later bumped to 150+ across two draws. One reviewer’s dashboard showed 129 color-coded markers.

Another reviewer counted 187 total across two draws six months apart (123 at baseline plus 64 on the retest). And Function Health’s false-advertising lawsuit alleges only 55 are direct lab measurements. That last one is an allegation, unresolved, not an adjudicated fact, so treat it as context rather than a verdict.

The dispute turns on derived metrics, and it’s worth understanding in plain English: some of what gets counted as a “biomarker” isn’t measured directly. It’s math done on top of other numbers, ratios and indexes computed from the measurements you actually got, then marketed alongside them. One reviewer’s bilirubin-to-albumin ratio got flagged high even though both components were normal. That’s the clearest example of where measured ends and computed begins.

So yes, you get a lot of data. Whether it’s 100+ tests is a question Superpower and Function Health will apparently settle elsewhere.

The testing experience: signup, blood draw, and waiting

The short version: expect an online intake, a fast, a quick draw at Quest, and results somewhere between next day and two weeks. Here’s the sequence.

Intake questionnaire and upsell screens

Signup starts with an online questionnaire covering recovery, training, nutrition, medications, and long-term priorities like disease prevention and fertility. One reviewer liked getting the full-lifestyle picture, and I get it; it’s more than a formality. Fair warning: there are upsell screens for panel upgrades embedded in the intake. Nobody loves a surprise sales pitch mid-questionnaire, so just know they’re coming.

The Quest Diagnostics blood draw

The logistics paragraph you’ll want to screenshot: you’ll need a 10-hour fast (in one account’s case), so book the earliest appointment or you’ll be hangry in the waiting room. The draw happens at a local Quest Diagnostics location, takes under 15 minutes, and there’s no extra payment at the counter. If leaving the house is the problem, the at-home draw is about $115 and someone comes to you.

The friction is real but not universal. One hands-on review of a gifted product (disclosed as such) hit an unconfirmed appointment and a cancellation nobody flagged. And a night-shift worker who couldn’t find any afternoon appointment that fit his schedule got a full refund on his $199 promotional purchase, which is at least evidence the company handles genuine scheduling dead-ends reasonably.

How long results actually take

Depends who you ask, genuinely. One reviewer got results the next day by text. Another waited 8 days for an email. Others report 3-5 business days, and some up to two weeks.

There’s no single authoritative timeline, and I’d rather tell you that than average those numbers into a fake stat. Plan on “about a week, possibly faster.”

My results: the Digital Twin dashboard, score, and biological age

When you log in, you see what Superpower calls a Digital Twin: a visual dashboard of your body, available on desktop and app, with color-coded biomarkers (129 showed up color-coded in one reviewer’s account) and a walkthrough of what each biomarker means across categories. Alongside the markers you get a Superpower Score and a biological age; one reviewer’s came back 86 out of 100 and 21.3, respectively. Those numbers are curious rather than meaningful on day one. A first score is a baseline, not a verdict. It only gains meaning compared against your next draw, which is the whole reason annual retesting matters here.

The honest critique: 187 numbers is a lot to face before coffee. If you’re not fluent in lab ranges, the dashboard can overwhelm, and the color coding helps more than it fully solves. The genuinely useful part is the downloadable PDF, which you can hand to your doctor or keep for comparison against future labs. More on that workflow below.

Testing the AI chat

The AI is the best and least reliable feature at the same time. On the good side, it explained a high folate flag as likely from fortified foods (a very common US flag, so don’t panic if you see it), suggested B12-rich foods like salmon and eggs to check for a masked deficiency, and it compares your bloodwork to your actual lifestyle rather than generic info. The bad part: that same bilirubin-to-albumin ratio flagged high despite both components being normal, and the AI itself called it “a mathematical artifact.” So either the metric or the AI is wrong.

Treat every flag as a question, not an answer. The AI did graduate from beta after six months and handled complex multi-condition questions well.

The Action Plan: useful for beginners, obvious for the optimized

The plan’s value is inversely proportional to how optimized you already are, and almost no review says that plainly, so: if you’re new to this, it’s great; if you’re not, it isn’t. The deliverable is a personalized protocol you can download as a PDF, with daily to-dos and big-picture goals, framed as 8-12 weeks to improvement. The proof of the tradeoff is that one wellness-experienced reviewer’s advice was Zone 2 cardio, a Mediterranean diet, and magnesium glycinate, all of which were already in her routine. Beginners get a genuinely actionable starting point. Experienced users get told things they already do.

Some things did improve. Protocols got simplified from a wall of text to a three-step plan, and there’s now a supplement marketplace with a 20% discount on most products. The critique that comes with it: follow-up plans skew supplement-focused, toward products Superpower sells. That conflict of interest is worth holding in mind before you fill a cart.

Customer service, billing, and cancellation: the real risk

The product is strong until something goes wrong, and the documented complaint pattern is the biggest gap between the marketing and the reality. My practical advice: plan for text-only support with multi-day delays, expect a retention quiz when you cancel, and screenshot your cancellation confirmation. (Superpower customer service phone number covers the contact channels in detail.)

The specifics come from recurring Trustpilot patterns, not universal outcomes. One reviewer estimated about 50/50 odds of getting a concierge response at all. Another waited up to 3 days for text replies. Rhonda Fellows reported a charge appearing after she cancelled a week before renewal, went through the retention quiz flow, and planned a credit card dispute.

Chad Blauer dealt with a duplicate panel recommendation and an incomplete low-testosterone retest over 9 months. John Duffy couldn’t confirm both panels he purchased were actually tested. That inconsistency is exactly the backdrop for judging whether the subscription is worth it, since ongoing annual retesting and trend tracking only pay off if the service delivers reliably, and the counterexample shows it can: that night-shift worker got a full refund without a fight, so it’s not uniformly bad, it’s inconsistent.

Red flag: If you cancel, screenshot the confirmation screen immediately — one reviewer was charged after cancelling a week before renewal.

Superpower does reply publicly to these complaints with apologies and promised direct outreach, pointing people to SuperpowerAI and clinical team text/email access. I’m reporting what they said, not whether it worked. And to be fully honest: no source documents an actual step-by-step cancellation walkthrough, so I can’t walk you through one. Screenshot everything and treat the cancellation like a process you need evidence of. (Superpower review complaints goes deeper on these patterns.)

Six months in: what changed and what still lags

Superpower ships fast: within six months, one reviewer’s longitudinal update found most early critiques fixed. The AI left beta, protocols shrank to three steps, Whoop, Oura, Apple Watch, Eight Sleep, and Garmin now sync in, imported labs feed the trends, and the marketplace added DEXA scans, Prenuvo whole-body MRI, VO2 max, genome sequencing, gut microbiome analysis, the Grail Galleri multi-cancer test, Alzheimer’s amyloid plaque screening, and GLP-1 access, among more. Your data is handled under HIPAA, for whatever reassurance that’s worth. What still lags: no thyroid antibodies (relevant if Hashimoto’s is on your mind) in the baseline or retest, a poor in-house mold test (they recommended MoldCo instead), and a marketplace that isn’t personalized to your blood work; it showed that reviewer unneeded testosterone medications. That’s one reviewer’s account, not independent verification, but it’s a decent signal that if you were previously deterred, the product you’d buy today isn’t the one those older reviews describe.

Superpower vs Function Health, InsideTracker, and the field

The decisive differences are price and that unresolved lawsuit. Function Health runs $365/year for 100+ markers versus Superpower’s $299, $349, and Function Health is the company alleging Superpower’s biomarker count is inflated, which is exactly the kind of competitive context that should inform your choice between them. InsideTracker is $149/year but aimed at athletes, so it’s a different audience rather than a direct rival. (Superpower vs Function Health does the full head-to-head.)

On Trustpilot, Superpower sits at 4.5/5, rated “Excellent,” based on a review count in the low hundreds. For context: Function Health 4.5 (3K reviews), Hone Health 4.8 (12K), Rythm 4.8 (3K), SiPhox 4.7 (964), Marek 4.8 (982), IM8 4.5 (2K), Vitalsvault 4.0 (3), HIMS 2.9 (9K). All of these ratings, Superpower’s included, come with a caveat: Trustpilot uses automated software to screen reviews, marks some as Verified, and prohibits incentivized or hidden reviews, but it doesn’t fact-check reviewer claims. Verified doesn’t mean true. And on Hone, the sources only support a ratings-level comparison, not a feature head-to-head, so I won’t pretend otherwise. (Superpower vs Hone explores where the comparison holds up.)

Can Superpower replace your doctor?

No, and the decisive condition is that it’s a workaround for access, not a replacement for care. Start with the skepticism, because it’s legitimate: mainstream medicine generally recommends against broad lab testing in healthy adults, and some experts warn that mass testing produces false positives. The emotional cost of that is real. One reviewer was seemingly inaccurately told biomarkers were high, and being told something’s wrong when it isn’t costs sleep, whether or not the flag turns out to be nothing.

Now the counter-frame, which is honestly the product’s deepest value proposition. One reviewer’s doctors refused her requested tests as not “medically necessary.” Another contacted 10+ primary care physicians and found the nearest in-network appointment 8 months out. If you’re uninsured or on a high-deductible plan without a primary care doctor, this is likely cheaper than an out-of-pocket visit, and it puts actual numbers in your hands instead of a “come back in eight months.”

The practical workflow: download the results PDF, bring it to your doctor to discuss specific biomarkers or compare against future labs. One frustration to know going in: the consult tool is built around prescriptions, not discussing results, so when you want to talk through your numbers with someone, the built-in path doesn’t really go there. (Is Superpower a reputable company looks at the lab certifications and data handling if legitimacy is your sticking point.)

Who Superpower is (and isn’t) right for

If you’ve read this far, you probably already sense the answer, but here it is straight: Superpower is worth it for people who’ve never had broad bloodwork, people who can’t easily get in front of a doctor, and people who want a plan rather than a pile of numbers. It’s a harder sell if you’re already deep into this stuff, and it deserves a careful look if you’re in eating-disorder recovery.

Who gets the most value. First-timers, because the Action Plan gives you a genuinely actionable starting protocol instead of a lab report you don’t know what to do with. People who want human support without hiring a functional medicine doctor, which is a real gap this fills at a fraction of that cost. AI-health-tool users who want everything in one place, since the chat, wearables, imported labs, and marketplace now live under one roof. People previously deterred by gaps in biomarker depth, because the six-month updates addressed most of them. And anyone without primary care access, where the math is simplest: for uninsured or high-deductible folks, this is likely cheaper than an out-of-pocket visit, and it’s available now rather than 8 months from now.

Who should think twice. The already-optimized, because the plan will tell you things you already do; my own results mostly confirmed my existing habits were paying off, and sometimes the win is validation rather than a fix, but validation is a $349 feeling. And readers in eating-disorder recovery should weigh the optimization focus carefully. One anti-diet reviewer’s findings are genuinely reassuring on this: the analyses were mostly weight neutral, the nutrition advice was additive rather than restrictive (fatty fish 3-4 times a week, daily soluble fiber, nuts, iron with vitamin C), the weight-centric warnings stayed confined to a skippable BMI section based on self-reported height and weight, and she disclosed her affiliate links. But she still cautioned recovery readers about the optimization framing, and I’d pass that along gently.

On the “is this legit” question: the Trustpilot aggregate (4.5/5 across hundreds of reviews), the documented full-refund case, and the company’s consistent public response pattern are the concrete evidence, weighed against the support complaints above. For what it’s worth, one reviewer credited Superpower’s recommendations with helping her mother, whose kidneys shut down after CT contrast and whose tests showed unusually high acidity, extend her life. That’s one story, medium confidence, from a single review, and I share it because it happened, not because it predicts your experience.

The verdict, attributed where it belongs: the reviewer who tested it concluded the price was worth it for the depth of data despite the overly simplistic AI advice, calling the test an incredible way to track internal health. Wellness Daddy scored it 46/50 (effectiveness 9.5, service 10, price 8, experience 9, Daddy factor 9.5) and named it the clear top pick in the category, “Wellness Daddy certified,” on his scale with his certification. My own take from this seat: if you’ve been crashing at 2:30 with no explanation and no easy way to ask why, the data is worth having. Just go in knowing the AI is a helpful translator, not a doctor, and keep your real one in the loop. (Is Superpower worth it runs the full cost-versus-value math if you’re still on the fence.)

Frequently Asked Questions